What was Problematic?Hello everyone, from Ty. I am being very forward with this article as it is an update and not a research paper. We have had this website since 2021, so around five years. I have yet to finish all of the species profiles on the site. Shame on me. Now, I have had some great changes from our start to now. For example, my day job in 2021 allowed me to work on the website for much of my shift as it was a more reactionary job. In other words, if something came up, I had to deal with it immediately, but there was a lot of down time. My current day job gives me no time to do such. This is not a complaint, but an explanation to why I have slowed down a lot. I started to do some math, and realized that if I focused one hour a day (seven days a week) on species profiles, I could finish them in about 1.6 years (without including proof-reading time). That said, this isn't a sustainable pace and there is an issue beyond finishing these profiles. A lot changes in five years. We have new information and sometimes I just make mistakes that have to be fixed. Sometimes our maps somehow default to other maps, and photos will do the same. I believe this is due to the file names being too similar. I also didn't still love the layout. I wanted to convey more information in less time. So, I decided we needed to do an overhaul to our profiles. I started looking around at some online guides, not for herps but for other taxons. I was inspired to make some changes I feel the herping hobby could greatly benefit from. For example, Cornell has some great bird sources between Merlin and All About Birds. So, what could I do to make a Merlin for Virginia herps? I think of this particularly, as we do hope to eventually make an app for Herping Virginia's Herp Guide since the website doesn't have the cleanest mobile view and an offline version would be really nice to have in the field. Obviously I don't want to make a 1:1 copy of Merlin, but I will say they are a major inspiration. So, I sat down and rebuilt our format for profiles and started rewriting some of the profiles from scratch. Hopefully, by having a more solid format, this will speed progress along. So, what should you expect? First, the buttons for the new profiles will look the same, but have "*New Profile*" displayed under them. When you click in, there will be sections. The following will break down each section. Photos & Quick Facts
Description & BehaviorThis is where I describe the animal and the behavior. I am trying to keep this to two paragraphs (first of description and second on behavior), but this will not always be the case. In the behavior section, I will slide in some tricks on finding these animals in many cases. Looks for things like: "They are active on wet nights, and often can be found by road cruising in such conditions." or "They shelter under debris during the day, and can often be found by flipping boards, logs, and tin." The description is pretty rudimentary. I also am doing my best to explain some of the scientific terminology better for new herpers, such as: "Two large "bumps" (parotid glands) behind the eye, over the tympanum (eardrum) are present." Habitat
CallsSimilar Species
Taxonomy & Phylogeny
We also see confusion with some groups such as skinks (many think are salamanders) and spadefoots and narrowmouths (often referred to as toads). Some species hybridize or form complicated complexes. This section is designed to help with those confusions. There will be paragraphs aiding with explaining all of this. Special SectionsSome species will have "specialized sections". Venomous snakes may have a section called "Venom", Spotted Salamanders will have a "Life Cycle" section, and other species may have sections I have yet to consider. Works Cited (when Necessary)That should be pretty clear... Many times what I am talking about is "common knowledge" (ex. "Northern Watersnakes are generally found around water.") which is not easy to cite or is always citable and therefore does not require citation. When I do have to cite is when I use a particular source to make a claim. This often is in debated cases and or in the phylogeny. There may not be multiple studies into the phylogeny of a particular genus or two studies may conflict. In conflicts, unless there is good reason to ignore one side (such as a major error or claims that require too many assumptions) I try to give both sides, while sticking to scientific consensus. If I buck the general consensus, I should make a good note why. Usually this occurs with ID, as there are several over-generalized "tricks" that I believe we all should be better at scrutinizing. Many of these comes from the slow shifting of literature where phrases like "often have" shifts to "have" as it is copied into new wording time and time again. Gallery
Final ThoughtsSo, I hope these changes make sense to everyone. This format also makes it easier for me to come back later and add new sections. Expect to see more and more profiles change over over the next few years. For now, if you wish to visit a new profile to try it, the one referenced throughout this article is the Fowler's Toad. I have also put together one for the Queensnake that you may explore. Thank you all for your support!
Comments are closed.
|
Ty (the SnakeMan) SmithTy is a Master Naturalist (with over 2,500 hours of volunteer service), former State Park Naturalist, and Virginia Herpetological Society (VHS) member with an expertise in East Coast Herp identification and southeastern species habitat/distribution. Archives
September 2026
Categories |